The case show this evening is on the subject of not lying, the fourth grave precept. The Chinese telegraph pronounced moral goal in Sino-Japanese are found in combination in the title of the fourth grace precept and not commonly elsewhere. The etymological meaning is forgetful or neglectful words. Deriving from this root meaning, The Buddhist and the secular dictionaries offer a lie, a deliberate lie, while to tell a lie.

[01:14]

Nakagawa Soinoshi used to paraphrase Dogen Zenji, saying, don't use ruthless words Thus we are cautioned to be loyal to the essence. The emphasis is on coming forth as the tathagata, not so much on being true to others. The byproduct of such loyalty is that we are true to others but the inspiration is Buddha nature. When this is clear, then the various social and psychological virtues of truth-telling are illuminated. Self-deception, deception of others, cheating, gossip, and carelessness with language are all disloyal to the peace in our heart of hearts.

[02:39]

Words expressive of that peace are true. Silence expressive of that peace is true. The peace of the vast and fathomless void, full of possibilities, are set forth clearly in the words of our ancestor. Bodhidharma said, Self-nature is subtle and mysterious. In the realm of the inexplicable Dharma, not preaching a single word is called the precept of not lying. The phrase, not preaching a single word, is open to misunderstanding.

[03:43]

But the Buddha himself turned the wheel of the Dharma in total silence when a philosopher said to him, I do not ask for words, I do not ask for non-words. The Buddha just sat there and the philosopher's delusions vanished like clouds before a strong wind. It is important to see how silence can be a presentation of the truth. When Yaka-san had not given a teisho for a long time, his monks persuaded him to appear in the Dharma Hall. He sat there silently in the Roshi's seat for a while as the monks waited

[04:48]

But then he returned to his room. The head monk followed him and complained, You consented to give a tesha. How is it that you said not a single word? Yaksan said, For citras, there are citra specialists. For shastras, there are shastra specialists. Why do you wonder at this old monk? Silence presents itself. Words present themselves. Dogen Zenji said, the Dharma wheel turns from the beginning There is neither surplus nor lack.

[05:52]

The whole universe is moistened with nectar and the truth is ready to be harvested. Not only is the truth already there, it is altogether delightful and ready to be accepted. Take me, says the fact. Fuketsu presented such a fact to a monk who was also concerned about words and non-words. Speech is a matter of subject and object. Silence is a matter of subject and object. How may I be free of subject and object?" Fuketsu says, I always think of Conan in March.

[07:01]

Partridges chirp among the many fragrant blossoms. Fuketsu and the Buddha used compassionate, expedient means to present the truth incisively. At other times in their lives, their actions and words were truthful but directed to quite ordinary purposes, such as asking for water or accepting a gift. Our own lives are full of ordinary purposes and also of crises. How may we be expressive of the truth in dealing with them? The doctor often faces the question of whether or not to tell a patient that an illness is terminal.

[08:09]

I recall speaking with someone from Japan who was giving me news of our friends there. He mentioned a person we both knew well and said that he had undergone an operation for cancer. Of course he doesn't know, my friend said. He thinks it is just an ulcer. This reflects a Japanese cultural interpretation of the fourth precept. There it is widely assumed that it is not compassionate to tell sick people the hard truth about their terminal illness. In our culture, we are starting to believe that it is important to tell patients the objective fact and to help them to become reconciled to it.

[09:15]

We are learning from social research that they really know anyway, and we are coming to feel that we should not encourage false games at the very point where sick people and their families can realize the deepest dimension of their relationship. What kind of karma does deception about fatal illness set up for the dying person? I don't know, but I sense it is dreadful. Perhaps this is how ghosts are born. And if family members are at all sensitive, the effects will be felt as unfinished business which cannot be finished. Now, as I read along here, I realize that I need another couple of paragraphs here to indicate...

[10:35]

how this example is a kind of metaphor for us in dealing with the hard truth in any circumstances, that there must be some compassionate way to admit to the truth, to speak the truth, that the truth may make all free. I'll try to word such a paragraph or two in here. At an ordinary level, not lying means right livelihood and right lifestyle and may involve

[11:38]

social activism. Not only must I not work for an ordinary advertising agency, but I must not swallow advertising lies either. Not lying means no complicity with lies. One of my students wrote to me, One of my strongest reasons for not registering for the draft and then resisting it publicly was my wish to resist the lies of power. There are, however, niches in our mendacious society for the truth seeker. There is honest business.

[12:39]

As you know, here in San Francisco, there are even unusual advertising agencies, even unusual banks. Depending on personal character and a variety of other factors, including the responsibility to help feed a family, One can elect to stay on the corporate bus and try to influence its direction, or one can get off and walk. Right livelihood is not solely a literal injunction, but also a matter of responding wisely to circumstances. This wisdom arises from original honesty. Ethics is common sense, the sense we have in common.

[13:49]

When a parent declares a six-year-old child is only five in order to avoid paying an extra fare, the child learns dishonesty. If the parent acknowledges the child's correct age and buys the extra ticket, then the inherent honesty of the child is confirmed. I'm six years old. That's the truth. In Japan, the Zen student is exhorted to be sincere. At least that is the way the word gets translated out. Be sincere, the head monk shouts in the dojo. I prefer the word honest, although I don't think I've ever shouted be honest in the dojo.

[14:58]

Though your work is focusing on Moo as Moo or whatever your work is there on your cushions, many tempting thoughts await in the wings. With just a moment's inattention, they come pouring forth. Be honest and stay attentive. Be in touch with your original honesty and your zazen will be the foundation of an honest life. This honesty is also creative. Manner and content, the two criteria of an appropriate response in the duksan room, both come from inner integrity. Regarding manner, one thing that strikes us in Chinese Zen dialogues, even in their translated forms, is vividness of language.

[16:15]

We say their words are poetry. And what is poetry but faithfulness to language? Sloppy language is a kind of disloyalty to humanity, a kind of lying. Talent or language is one of the few qualities that distinguishes human beings from other animals. But this talent is often dulled by the abstract discipline of education, and one finds relatively illiterate people who are more closely in touch with language and therefore with themselves than professors of philosophy. I recall discussing the roads of eastern Oregon with a woodsman there who complained that he had to replace his tires much more often now that his son had a girlfriend.

[17:21]

I tell you, he said, dancing is very hard on tires. In touch with ourselves, we speak faithfully. The content of the response is just as revealing as the manner. Deeper than culture, transcending expedience, beyond morality, The great truth cannot be concealed. At the end of the summer training period, Suigon said to his assembly, All summer I have been preaching to you brothers. Look closely. Do I still have my eyebrows? It is said that when a Zen teacher preaches false Dharma, the worst kind of lying, his eyebrows fall off.

[18:31]

But Srigan is revealing everything to the very bottom. Engle, the editor of the booklet record where this case appears, and incidentally this is only a portion of a much longer case, Engle says that of all the ancients, Srigan is one of the greatest, and says, and this is from the Cleary translation, Many people misunderstand and say, under the bright sun in the blue sky, Srigan spoke aimless talk, producing concern where there was none. At the end of the summer, he spoke of his own faults and examined them himself first to avoid having others criticize him. Fortunately, this has nothing to do with it. Such views are called the exterminators of the Buddha race, Ango says.

[19:39]

Look at the way he talks. Ango challenges us. What is his true meaning? But don't let Ango fool you. There is no meaning here. There is no sword hidden in Srigan's words. Look closely. Do I still have my eyebrows? The truth is ready to harvest. Meaning gets in the way of truth all too often. I remember cringing at the words of Charles Manson and his followers during their trials for murder. For them, it seems, killing was the way to prove the truth of oneness.

[20:48]

Even murder, they seem to say, is no different from making love. The truth is ready to harvest but we must be ready to harvest it. Shibayama Zenkei Roshi once said to me, Zen practice is for people in excellent mental health. I think Zen practice can be therapeutic for some people in poor mental health. but the teacher must be able to dispel their pernicious concepts of eternal verities. When Hyakujo was training under Basso, a monk asked the teacher, Apart from the four phrases and the 100 negations, please tell me directly why Bodhidharma came from the West.

[21:58]

In other words, without affirming, without denying, without not affirming, without not denying, and without all the other permutations and combinations of affirmation and denial, What is the fundamental truth which Bodhidharma conveyed? At first glance, all the responses here, it might seem that Baso and his senior disciples could not move their lips or throats in response. Baso said, I am tired today and cannot explain it to you. Go and ask Jiso. The monk asked Ciso about it. Ciso said, Why don't you ask his reverence? The monk said, His reverence said to ask you. Ciso said, I have a headache today and cannot explain it to you.

[23:07]

Go and ask Brother Kai. Brother Kai is Hyakujo. The monk asked Brother Kai, who said, I don't know at all about that matter. The monk returned to Basso and told him about this. Basso said, Chizos had his fight. Kais had his duck. Aren't they? this is a reference, the white and black head is a reference to Chinese folklore, which needs a little explanation here, just as an aside. Whitehead and blackhead were two thieves who tried to get the better of each other. And they were kind of like spy versus spy in old Mad Magazine. There's a story of...

[24:08]

a woman looking down into a well and sobbing. And Whitehead comes along and says, why are you weeping? And she says, I lost my precious valuable earring down the well. And I don't know how I can face my father now that I've lost it. And she said, don't worry, ma'am. I'll go down the bucket rope and find that earring for you. So he removed his clothes and let himself down the bucket rope and looked all around and was thinking, you see, that I will find the earring and say I didn't find it. couldn't find it, really. So he climbed back up and everything had disappeared, including his clothes. It was, of course, Blackhead disguised as the women.

[25:16]

That's one of the many, many stories about Blackhead and Whitehead. Thieves, you know, are thieves of your delusions and your attachments in Zen literature. So when a monk calls the teacher, you old Robert, he is being very affectionate and complimentary. And in this story, please don't suppose that Bosso and Chizzo and Keperjo are putting everything back on the monk so that the monk could figure it out. That isn't the point. It also might seem that the hapless monk was just getting the runaround, you know, like a recruit being sent from one supply sergeant to another up and down the battalion street looking for a tent stretcher.

[26:28]

But really, Basso, Ciso, and Hyakujo were flashing the truth free of all concepts directly in the face of the inquiring monk, no less than Suigan confronting his brothers, no less And this is a reference to our experiences at Kokorong, no less than the doves that sing to us each early morning. A student said to me, I feel as though I have learned the language, but I have not yet visited the country. I think I made reference to this the other night. I feel as though I have learned the language, but I have not yet visited the country. This is an important insight.

[27:32]

You can appreciate Bodhidharma, Vaso, and all their great successes, but appreciation is not enough. You can resonate to the authenticity of the doves, the integrity of the stones in the garden, the honesty of the sun, the moon, and the stars. But what about your own ground of truth? That is none other than Daigo, great enlightenment, the daily activity of the Buddhas, as Dogen Zenji says, but they never think about it. Don't be carried away by your own smooth talk, and I must be careful about this one too. The fourth precept, like all the others, finds its home in zazen, in the vast and fathomless void that can only be likened to outer space.

[28:45]

It also finds its home in family discussions, in business meetings and dealing privately with personal inadequacies. The truth expressed with love is the Sangha treasure moistened with nectar. Thank you. Thank you. What we all want to do is to be honest with each other and be open to what we have to give and what we should give and what we shouldn't [...]

[30:13]

They were just going to go on and [...] on again and [...] again If we allow the Lord God to help you in your life and in your life as well as [...] in your life Good evening. I will go to Green Gulch with Anne and speak there on the fifth great precept, not taking drink or drugs.

[31:26]

Please come. Do any of you have questions or comments? Yes. The question I asked last night about magic, I didn't feel I was able to possess so thoroughly. I'd like to try again in the context of not telling most. Okay. We have in the Lotus Sutra Father offering various hearts or his imaginary hearts for his children that are outside the burning house to try to get them to believe the burning house.

[32:29]

The truth is the house is burning. That's the truth. Yeah. So I imagine what I mean is something to get us to feel good about what we're doing in the house. Oh, I see. I see. Now, I think one of the problems... So my question is what the proper use... of magic, if that in that sense is, and how is it abused? Yes, go ahead. One way that I think we can see a type of abuse is if there's some ulterior motive, if

[33:39]

If the father is trying to get the children to leave the house, if the father wants to get something else from one of the ringings before he goes out himself, whatever. But aside from that type of abuse, There's perhaps also some dependency that's set up on various hearts that are offered. And for a community of any size, there's some vision that is being generated that acts as a glue that binds the community. And that blue, I think, is for the vision.

[34:48]

It's like this car. So in part, To me, the fourth precept involves not being dependent on the cards. Yes, like not being dependent on advertising lies. Yes. Yes. Yes. Now, we're speaking quite metaphorically here. I like the example of working with children, which is fundamentally what the Lotus Sutra is using as a metaphor, the father working with the children.

[35:50]

Given the fact that there are many things that children don't understand, you can still tell the truth to the children in a broad, crude, general way. I rather deplore the way some parents do of giving up trying to tell the truth because it's too complex or too intimate or something to the children, but rather telling them something else, like, you know, you're born under a cabbage leaf or something like that. Maybe that's a good example. When my little boy was... How old? Two and a half, I think. He was fascinated by the house spiders, which are also called cane spiders, which live comfortably in homes in Hawaii.

[37:07]

They're about this big around. And they eat cockroaches and mosquitoes. They don't spin any web except on their tummies. and the web is a kind of exterior womb in which the young are nurtured. The eggs are laid in this exterior womb and then they grow there and then they hatch out of this white covering and crawl all over the mother's body and crawl around with her for a while before they're big enough to go on their own. He was fascinated by this. And I said to him, you know, that's like babies are blind, except that that white capsule, you know, or something like it, is inside.

[38:09]

And he said, really? I said, yeah. Really? Yes. Okay. That was the end of the conversation. I didn't try to explicate any further, you know, at that point. But I think that, in other words, such a kind of crude or general truth is possible, you know, to convey to a child... when the child is certainly not ready for the mechanics of reproduction and would only be appalled if you tried to go into them. I think that the teachers of teachers of sex education now say to respond to the questions as they arise naturally, you know, providing that you have a relationship of trust with the child and the child is naturally going to ask questions.

[39:13]

Anyway, it seems to me that in a relationship of teacher and student in, say, a Zen community, the introductory lectures don't contain the material that the student is going to get later. But they're going to be true in themselves. So the incentives, so to speak, must themselves be true. If we're going to use means to accomplish ends, then we must keep in mind that the means themselves are ends. And that the essential stuff that we're teaching is naturally interesting.

[40:22]

And we don't need to add anything to it. We don't need to jazz it up or shiver it up at all. So the glue that can hold the Sangha together, you see, is this essential truth which we understand in our own way, whether we are beginners or old-timers. The old-timers will understand it in a little more detailed and perhaps a more deep way. But it will be the same truth that the beginners understand. This is my ideal, anyway. Does this speak to your question? Yes. across the slide to confide to it is that often maybe another way of saying what I'm talking about is encouragement.

[41:30]

Yes. Encouragement is A Zen community is a voluntary community. Yes. So we generate, each one of us, many of us, and the teacher or generates an encouragement. Mm-hmm. That's right. That's right. Go ahead. Okay. So you need to, as a teacher, you need to show the student that what he or she is saying or doing is right on. You see? I had fun with this when I was teaching a class in the Upward Bound program many years ago in the 60s.

[42:40]

Well, there still are Upward Bound programs, really, but it was part of the old Office of Economic Opportunity, the War on Poverty in the 60s. It was a program for disadvantaged high school students who had the ability to go on to college with... scholarships and with a little coaching academic coaching and so I was part of this program for a couple of years and in the English class I encouraged these students to write poetry and these were juniors people who are between their junior and senior year in high school most of them had never read a book They were from areas that were disadvantaged. Most of them had never read a book. They were from areas that were disadvantaged. And so, when a kid would come to class with a poem, and I could do it, I would read a poem from

[43:53]

from literature that had the same kind of idea that he brought forth in his point or she brought forth in her point. And I kind of put them side by side. The one example I remember was a poem that the boy wrote. He was riding in on the bus from Waianae in this creaky old gaseous uh bus you know that had faulty floorboards and a faulty muffler and he was inhaling these awful fumes all the way in and he was half asleep from a late night i think and but he happened to look up and look out at the ocean where they were going by and he saw a school of fish jumping see apparently there was a the larger fish underneath it was frightening him And his poem was about this incident, and the last few lines were to the effect that this made his day.

[45:00]

And I remembered something afrost, and I can't remember the poem now. I'd have to go back and look it up. But the last line is, and it saved a part of the day I had rubbed. I had regretted it. So I was able to put these two points side to side. Well, this is maybe the first poem that he ever wrote, you see, but somehow I was able to show him that he was already writing literature. So it's this kind of encouragement that the teacher must seek out. It's absolutely true that he had the same idea as Robert Frost. So I'm not bluffing a bit. I'm not faking it. I'm not summoning up some kind of false encouragement or anything. I'm giving him genuine encouragement that he can do it. He's already done it. Yes? During dinner this evening I had a talk with someone and we were discussing

[46:10]

various teachers, and this person from another group was visiting, and we were talking about the true dharma. And Kurt was saying it seems like some teachers have the true dharma and some teachers don't have the true dharma. And Kurt was quite clear about which I was very Catholic for, because it wasn't that easy for me to tell. So what do you think about What do you think about that? And is it possible to tell what the truth is? Well, maybe two things. Is it possible to tell that a person really understands the old truth?

[47:16]

And also, is it possible to tell that among maybe Many people, various people, are in jñāna, in bed, and so on. Who wants true inclinations? Uh-huh. All right. A question, but an important one. Remember, first of all, what the Buddha said, that all beings are the tathāgata. It's their delusions and attachments that keep them from realizing that fact. So the question is not how true a person is, but how successful he or she has been in clearing up those delusions and attachments. That's the important thing. A keen nose for bullshit is an excellent attribute.

[48:18]

Now, about the various traditions, you know, I read Tartung Tukul, is that his name, the Tibetan teacher? Yes, with real pleasure. and excitement sometimes. I certainly read large parts of Eckhart in this way. And there was a time when I was reading nothing but... What is his name? The Sufi teacher of 80 years ago. Hasbun... Anyway, I've just forgotten his name now. But anyway, he was the one who established the Sufi Center in Switzerland and is regarded as one of the early founders of the movement in the West.

[49:43]

I read him with a good deal of pleasure. I read Lidl Kananda with a good deal of pleasure. And so on. the truth comes out in many forms. That's what I'm trying to say. Do you think most Christians have their blind spots? Well, yes. The Buddha made a generalization about that, too, didn't he? Yes. Yes. Yes. When we look at Shakyamuni Buddha himself, we can see a progression in his teaching from his first sermon on the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path to his much more sophisticated and profound sermons toward the end of his life. We can see changes in his social attitude, his attitude toward women, for example.

[50:48]

changed during that time. So that I think that at any given time in any given teacher's life there will be blind spots. Yes. Whether these blind spots will be actually handicaps in conveying the Dharma, you know, that's something else. But I think there's no teacher without a blind spot. Mental clarity. Yes. It seems to me that we've been talking about this all along. I think I said the first night, that it is possible for a person to be superficially clear.

[51:58]

If you're doing Shikantaza, to have a quiet, peaceful mind. But there is a floor under that, and under that floor there's heaven knows what. In the same way, it is possible to have a genuine kind of kencho, a genuine kind of realization experience, and to move along in koan practice, but to feel incomplete. There is something deeper yet. So it is important that we not be simplistic in assuming that zazen is going to give us complete clarity in one lifetime, you know.

[53:04]

We have the advantage of a number of different kinds of therapies that can be of help. And when I sense in working with a student that there is something incomplete there. And I feel sure enough of our relationship that I know that there will be no offense taken. I don't hesitate to suggest seeing a good counselor. to go along, double-track counseling and zazen, or to give up zazen for a while and just do counseling. It's important to be as whole as possible. So, from Shibayama Yoshi's point of view, you see, in a culture where there was no, or practically no,

[54:13]

counseling in our Western sense of the word, at least in his time, he felt that the best students were the ones who came to him already pretty clear, you see. But we're fortunate that we don't have to be that discriminating. Let's see. Go ahead. Sure. You know, one of the things I... One of the things I cut out of my Taisho Unlying, because my student readers thought it was sort of trivial, was an example that I used to use back in the old New Age days, you know, the old New Age days, when we had sort of a swirling population on Maui, and

[55:42]

We didn't know really who we had among our members because they were not there yesterday and they wouldn't be there tomorrow. But police often came to the door because these were young people, some of them very young people, whose parents were worried about them. You know, Aunt Susie might be sick and they want to let the child know and they don't know how to get in touch with the child, so they call the police and say, I'm pretty sure my child is unmarried, and give the name. So the cop comes to the door and says, I'm looking for Susie, Susie so-and-so. And in such a case, what do I do? You see, all kinds of conflicting... loyalties come to my mind. You know, I want to protect the temple. I want to protect Susie. What's she up to? So I kind of hesitate. And he says, well, you know, her folks are trying to get in touch with her. So if she's here, then I go call her. But suppose he said, I've got a summons here.

[56:49]

What do I do? Well, I'm tempted to tell a lie. But probably I won't. Probably I'll say, just a minute, and I'll go and look up the person and say, hey, there's a guy with a summons at the door. I think you'd better take care of it. But suppose somebody comes to the door with a knife in his hand and wants to find Susie. See? I'm sure enough going to say that Susie just left for Pocatello. Yes. So I think one can find one's way through these dilemmas and find that the so-called precepts that we're breaking are not really precepts to be broken, but the precepts are descriptions of enlightened behavior.

[57:52]

You see, they're not laws or rules. OK. I'm very difficult in phrasing this question, but I've been reading Paul Tillich, who criticizes Eastern mysticism generally, because he says it doesn't answer the main problem of all times, which is the question of meaning in our lives, that many of us find light rather meaningless, and that Eastern religions tend to skirt around the problem by saying everything is an illusion anyway. So perhaps mysticism doesn't deal with that question. I suppose one way of rephrasing that, using something from what you're saying, is that meaning sometimes hides truth. Does truth give meaning in the sense that it was taught? You know, Tillich and D.T.

[59:03]

Suzuki and Tillich and Hisamatsu had many dialogues, and they went by each other like trains in the night, using the same words differently, really. When Tillich says that Eastern religions dodge the issue because they say that everything is an illusion anyway, he's only saying half of it. Because he's only showing the farmer's emptiness side. There's also the emptiness is foreign side. Solid is a rock. very clear. I see you, you see me. So, realization itself is a sense experience.

[60:08]

If you go around saying, it's all empty, you know, there's no realization at all because there's nothing to prompt the realization and nothing a part to which to prompt. There's nothing here to be prompted. So it's only half the story, and therefore not true. About meaning, Yamadaroshi is always saying, to tell the truth, he has this in his book, to tell the truth, mū has no meaning. You see? That move is meaningful. And I tell the students that I work with, it's like surfing or swimming. Surfing, swimming.

[61:12]

They have no meaning. But you can say what surfing is. You can say what swimming is. you can show what it is. But does eating have meaning? Does sleeping have meaning? See? Meaning is what Paul Tellick thrived on, what was happening in his head. But there's That is the table itself. And for some person, I can imagine, is the trigger of an enlightenment experience.

[62:15]

But if you ask the person, what was your experience Only that in the whole universe. Only that with the whole universe. It might be interesting for you to go back and look at some of those early issues of the Eastern Buddhists with those dialogues between Di Martino and Suzuki and Shinichi Isamatsu. Yes. Yes. That's an interesting matter. Where there is no humor, you know, I'm tempted to say no truth.

[63:35]

I'm suspicious of humorless discourse, maybe suspicious of last night's discourse, for example. No humor, at least from my side. This is what we sense in the Zen dialogues, isn't it? Lightness. Who was it? Issan and Kyozan, I think, the founders of the Egyal school. Kyozan asked Issan, Oh, Issan asked Kyozan, What if someone says to you, Everything is in a disorderly karmic consciousness and there is no base to rely upon? So Issan said, If a person asks me that question, I'll call to him.

[64:47]

And when he turns his head, I'll say, there is only a disorderly karmic consciousness and no base to rely upon. The whole base, the whole truth itself is completely empty. So that's the greatest joke of all. There is no absolute, and that is the absolute. So heavy-handed expressions of the truth are suspect. One of the stories I tell further along in the book is when I was in the internment camp And very late in the war, the head guard told somebody, and it immediately spread throughout the camp, that if Japan lost the war, we'd all be lined up and shot.

[66:01]

And we were sitting around feeling pretty sorry for ourselves. And one of the, well, the camp clown came into the room. And he said, hey, guys, did you hear the news? The head monk, the head god says that... The head god said that if Japan lost the war, we'd all be lined up and shot. And, you know, what we felt when he said that. We wished that he wouldn't fire that. And he says, I'll tell you, fellas, A hundred years from now, it won't make any difference. Okay. Well, I guess I was thinking more... Now, just through this evening, I worked with a... I don't know.

[67:20]

I don't know. I think there's a kind of banter that is responsible. And there's a kind of banter that's just jive. Zen Center student, an old friend, sent me a book called Impro. I don't know if you know this book. Impro stands for improvisation. It's a book by a drama teacher who uses improvisation in his drama classes. It's published by Theater Arts Books.

[68:24]

It's a book I can recommend to all of you. It's a kind of non-Buddhist everyday mondo, really. A way of keeping the ball in the air, so to speak. So let's see. I'll use an example here. If I say to you, did you bring the stuff? What do you say? See, it dies there. You dropped the ball. You asked me that question. I left it at the jail. I was there to see Uncle George. Well, I found out they executed him last week. Did you see him?

[69:24]

No, no, no. You see? That kind of thing. That is improvisation. It's a kind of play, in the best sense of the word. Drama and play, all together. And it's good fun. And kids do it. And the book, Infro, is full of this stuff. And it keeps you alive and alert and, you know, striking sparks all the time. And it's true kind of everyday dharma combat.

[70:24]

This kind of light banter actually sharpens the mind. You don't know what somebody is going to say to you. You have no idea. Whereas jive tends to fall into grooves and is really basically kind of dull. I think. Yes? So the word precept doesn't mean relate to language. It's always getting a kind of a prosaic glance to literalness. No, that's why I used the example of my friend the woodsman.

[71:30]

I was on the Continental Walk in 1976. in the counter-bicentennial. And I was just on part of it. We walked across the Texas panhandle and into Oklahoma. That was my section of it. And, you know, I'm from out on the periphery, out in the state of Hawaii, and I really, I grew up there from the age of five, and I really don't know that much about the United States, particularly the Central Park. So it was a revelation to me to hear the Texas Panhandle people and the Oklahoma people talk because they are marvelously articulate and they use marvelous figures of speech. And they never repeat them. You know, I suppose after you know the guy a year or so, well, you'll begin to hear the repetitions, but really they are very inventive.

[72:39]

And they knew a couple of fellows, drinking beer and tossing the beer cans in the back of their pickup, were fascinated by this little band of people that were walking along the freeway with their banners and their drummers, you know. So they followed us in their pickup, you know, and talked to us when we stopped to rest and when we had our meals. and then we camped out and next morning there they were so as we were breaking camp i got to talking with this one chap about gun control because he would always turn the question of peace around to gun control which he was opposed to because he was a hunter he talked so fascinatingly on this subject which I couldn't have ever related to under any other circumstances, that I actually taped his words, and he consented to this.

[73:44]

Because here was a person almost... was almost Neanderthal in the best sense of the words. LAUGHTER neanderthal thinking about hunting you see because he was really he really worshipped the animals that he killed and he was very respectful to them and and grateful to them and he could say all this in this marvelous in this marvelous country way with these vivid images convinced me Yes, so it doesn't have to be. In fact, it's better if it isn't so scholarly and academic. And I hear, you know, and most of the time, when I hear that, you know, that you're correct, but it kind of that way.

[74:46]

And it isn't that bad to me. No, no, I think it doesn't. That's a good lesson, you know and It's a lesson that that I am very much aware of in my in my own heart There's a dark side for doing anything, you know, a dark reason. You might say impure reason. And it's hard to look at those things. But why did I write a book about the precepts? Maybe I tend to be rather moralistic and judgmental, you see. This is probably a blind spot.

[75:56]

Probably a kind of a blind spot that I need to polish up. But as Thich Nhat Hanh says, you know, awareness is like the sun. When you are aware of something, then it changes. So you are aware of your judgmental attitudes, and that can help you to change. I hope I can be aware of my own judgmental ways. Yes. I had a question some time ago. I hear bam, bam, bam. It's been on my mind for a long time. St. Paul advised the Christians not to act. Well, he did. But sometimes, they say, well, I think more comments . And I wonder about big comments, anyone's behavior, or he's trying to be quiet and live a more externally mindful life, the cultivating life.

[77:17]

It does not help me like that. Or to go with the perhaps more urgent of the moment, anything you'd like with that? Well, as I said tonight, you know, there's a time to stay on the bus and try to steer it, to try to guide it, and there's a time to get off and walk. When I am with certain of my relatives, I wish I weren't. Because their talk not only bores me, but it eats away at my gut. So there is certainly a time.

[78:24]

I wouldn't get close to that if they weren't my relatives. I would stay away completely. At the present time, Ann and I don't even own a TV. And we're in the process of moving. We may get one, but you can be sure it will be dark most of the time because I personally can't stand it. Someone spoke of Saint Paul. I don't want to be all things to all people. All my instincts turn me away from that. Even though if I'm with such people and it is my responsibility to be with them, then I try my best to be with them.

[79:25]

But if it's not going to hurt anybody's feelings, I turn off the TV. And if it's not going to hurt anybody's feelings, I'll say, excuse me, but I've got to go home. And perhaps that is an act of teaching. I don't know. But it's not intended that way, fundamentally not intended that way. with my relatives, I try to join in that banter. I'm quieter than they are, I think. But I don't want to stand out and make them feel bad or make them feel that I'm holier than they are. Thank you.

[80:38]

I want to give a comment on that. Well, this is one of the things that you should hear with your ecumenical acusticon. In my view, the true Buddhist center or monastery or zendo is a center of peace which, by its nature at the deepest level, is also a center of power, a power for harmony, which then flows out naturally to the wider community. It flows out across the street to the grocery store, for example.

[81:49]

At CCLA, it flows out to the medical clinic. At Dianasanga, it flows out to our journals for Hawaii and so on. No, not necessarily, because there are all kinds of people. And there is a kind of person who functions best at the very center of that. activity. And then there are others who function best in the outreach. But I was speaking generally of this amorphous thing called a Zen center in which we can see an outflowing. But certainly each person in his or her own way will flow out if the center is one of peace.

[83:01]

whether it's just within an immediate group or whether it is in the whole world. I thought a couple of days ago that you were actually having a special problem there, He said something about how the worm was going to get crazier and crazier and then kind of become more like the aisles of cheese that she could throw there. Oh. Yes. Of course, it will be like that for some people, you know. inevitably, who will want to come and do retreat here or become members or become monks.

[84:09]

So for them, at least for a while, it will be a sanctuary. And I agree that the world is getting crazier and crazier. I do think, however, and it seems to me with his own outreach, he is showing, you know, that he is concerned about bringing that message of peace to the world. that our function is like the old wobbly function, you know, to create a growth of new within the shell of the old somehow. That's opening a bag of worms. We're getting close to time to call it a minute.

[85:15]

I want to thank you all for coming to these talks. They have been very instructive to me. And the people who have come to see me individually have taught me a lot. I am very grateful for this. I have perhaps not been sensitive enough in my role here of a guest speaker. Please bear with me in that way. I know my own way of blind spot perhaps of blurting out what I think. And I know this is painful.

[86:20]

But like the, I have some faith. or maybe it's justification, I don't know, that a fresh point of view can add some understanding of the problems that the community is going through. And I hope that none of my ideas will be taken literally, but that they will be added to the soup, and that you will have a good meal. Thank you very much.

[87:09]

@Transcribed_UNK
@Text_v005
@Score_51.5